Fotomagico pixel dimension10/30/2022 ![]() ![]() ![]() Take into account that you can probably get away with lower resolutions with most audiences. Much of this hinges on how you want your final images to look, i.e., is the final resolution good enough for you or do you want finer resolution. This may be a little late but if not for your benefit then for the benefit of others. Will be interested to hear what solution you finally come up with. #FOTOMAGICO PIXEL DIMENSION MAC#(It sounds like you have a good plan for doing this, but make sure you have a backup mac and screen available somewhere if you need it and you also need to make sure someone is trained to restart things if necessary). I would caution you to be very careful to make sure you can control the final playing environment. (For example, as you get closer to the object with the camera moving at constant speed, the picture will appear to accelerate towards you.) There are also some other subtle differences. it won't start and stop completely suddenly, whereas a pan or zoom might just come to a dead stop. A rostrum camera will accelerate and decelerate on a curve with smoothed ends, i.e. This is the difference between a simple pan and zoom and the effect a rostrum camera will give. My understanding is that the benefit of using After Effects is that it can give a sense of real movement in three dimensions. I was project managing this and the issue of the difference between AE and a two-dimensional animation tool was something that was considered as part of the project. Our firm used it for a project at the City of London Visitor Centre which involved bringing together a lot of images. My own inclination would be to use after effects if you want to duplicate the effect of the rostrum camera. In the old days, you would have achieved this using an expensive piece of equipment called a rostrum camera. I may be making a mountain out of a molehill, but I think you are going to want something a bit more subtle than the simpler tools can provide. The other way to handle zoom-in is toĬross-dissolve from a smaller image to a larger one. However, as long as you constrain your scaling to DOWNWARD, you're fine. Rather than giving me the original 800*600 pixels, Keynote just doubles the size of the 400*300 Then I use Keynote's animation to scale it up byĪ factor of two. ![]() Reason, I scale that down to 400*300 pixels at the start of a sequence. Let's say that I start with an image of 800*600 pixels. The only problem is that scaling UP is not ideal. In addition, because Keynote is slide-based, it's going to be easier to assemble & re. Moves (even on a path), scaling (albeit only to 200%), It's easier thanįlash and has most of the flexibility required for the stated task. One hesitates to venture into heretic realms, but I think this might be a PERFECT time to use Keynote. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |